April 23, 2014 at 1:40 pm
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn170449(v=sql.120).aspx
Under Requirements:
"Free disk space for that is two times the size of your durable memory-optimized tables."
Under Important Notes:
"The total in-memory size of all durable tables in a database should not exceed 250 GB."
I have not used these tables yet. Can someone validate/correct my assumption that the requirement of 'two times the size' is the hard disk space, but the 'total in-memory size' is the virtual memory limit?
Thanks!
April 23, 2014 at 8:46 pm
My first question is... do you actually have a problem where Hekaton would actually solve the problem? Hekaton is not a performance panacea.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 23, 2014 at 8:54 pm
BWAAA-HAAAA!!!! And now I see the question of the day is exactly what you're looking up?
Please drive through. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 24, 2014 at 6:42 am
To be honest, not quite sure how this wound up in the forums... I was posting a reply to the QOTD from Wed. 4/24.
I do not have an actual use case; just using the QOTD to learn new things & keep my finger on the SQL pulse.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply