February 26, 2013 at 9:17 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item OUTPUT - 1
February 26, 2013 at 9:23 pm
the answer is ambiguous and depends from collations
get my point back 🙂
I Have Nine Lives You Have One Only
THINK!
February 26, 2013 at 10:49 pm
Really very good Question.
Thanks
Vinay Kumar
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Learning - Keep Growing !!!
February 26, 2013 at 11:26 pm
handkot (2/26/2013)
the answer is ambiguous and depends from collations
I agree somewhat
The answers will change if the database collation is case sensitive
But, overall a very good question.
How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help - Jeff Moden
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/
February 26, 2013 at 11:27 pm
Very nice question, thanks Ron.
Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
February 27, 2013 at 12:09 am
Nice Question Ron. Thanks 🙂
~ Lokesh Vij
Link to my Blog Post --> www.SQLPathy.com[/url]
Follow me @Twitter
February 27, 2013 at 12:51 am
handkot (2/26/2013)
the answer is ambiguous and depends from collations
+1
😉
February 27, 2013 at 1:03 am
Very interesting question, did not know until now... and I answered all correct with just mental work 🙂 and I can feel my confidence is somewhat kicking in back..
(note : I know (and most of all know) collation is very important and each server/database/table or any object which is qualified for using collation has one by default whether or not we set it explicitly and result of the underlying task depends on it... I am not arguing that it must not be used or mentioned... but when the collation is not mentioned by the author in any qtod lets take it as the default say "Latin1_General_CI_AI"; mentioning the collation and its varied results in every qtod's reply is really... (dont know why it is bothering me...)... and i know now you all have a lot to say on this and like i said "i am not arguing here" its just the same replies to qtod.. kind of old gig now.. and I apologize if I offended anyone with this comment, it is not intentional; it is in general)
ww; Raghu
--
The first and the hardest SQL statement I have wrote- "select * from customers" - and I was happy and felt smart.
February 27, 2013 at 1:10 am
Kingston Dhasian (2/26/2013)
handkot (2/26/2013)
the answer is ambiguous and depends from collationsI agree somewhat
The answers will change if the database collation is case sensitive
But, overall a very good question.
Well, I did see the whoops with a small w , but carried on with default collation of case insensitive .. a typo I guess 😛
thanks for the question .
~ demonfox
___________________________________________________________________
Wondering what I would do next , when I am done with this one :ermm:
February 27, 2013 at 1:13 am
demonfox (2/27/2013)
Kingston Dhasian (2/26/2013)
handkot (2/26/2013)
the answer is ambiguous and depends from collationsI agree somewhat
The answers will change if the database collation is case sensitive
But, overall a very good question.
Well, I did see the whoops with a small w , but carried on with default collation of case insensitive .. a typo I guess 😛
thanks for the question .
+1
ww; Raghu
--
The first and the hardest SQL statement I have wrote- "select * from customers" - and I was happy and felt smart.
February 27, 2013 at 1:51 am
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
February 27, 2013 at 2:23 am
handkot (2/26/2013)
the answer is ambiguous and depends from collationsget my point back 🙂
Does that mean you assumed the collation was Case Sensitive? Normally, when no specific information is given, it's safe to assume the default, especially considering the context of the question.
February 27, 2013 at 3:26 am
I honestly had not used the OUTPUT clause before, I can see how it would be helpful, so for me it's a good question, regardless of the case sensitivity blip.
February 27, 2013 at 4:26 am
took a stab in the dark... missed totally
good question, look forward to playing with it when i finally get 2012 :-P;-)
Regards
ld
Stoke-on-Trent
United Kingdom
If at first you don't succeed, go to the pub and drink away your current thought plan.
February 27, 2013 at 4:47 am
ldorian81 (2/27/2013)
took a stab in the dark... missed totallygood question, look forward to playing with it when i finally get 2012 :-P;-)
Why would you require 2012 to play with OUTPUT clause? This got introduced in 2005 🙂
~ Lokesh Vij
Link to my Blog Post --> www.SQLPathy.com[/url]
Follow me @Twitter
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 43 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply