March 2, 2014 at 5:29 am
Question is identical with that of 2014/02/26.
The answer is also identical.
Am I missing something?
Igor Micev,My blog: www.igormicev.com
March 2, 2014 at 11:46 am
Igor Micev (3/2/2014)
Question is identical with that of 2014/02/26.The answer is also identical.
Am I missing something?
+1
But where is EXCEPT-1?
Why, if the qotd is identical to that of 2014/02/26, somebody got it wrong?
March 2, 2014 at 11:34 pm
Carlo Romagnano (3/2/2014)
Igor Micev (3/2/2014)
Question is identical with that of 2014/02/26.The answer is also identical.
Am I missing something?
+1
But where is EXCEPT-1?
Why, if the qotd is identical to that of 2014/02/26, somebody got it wrong?
+1 Was expecting something different based on the category. Thanks for the easy points!
March 2, 2014 at 11:48 pm
Easy one, thanks.
---------------------------------------------------
"Thare are only 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
March 3, 2014 at 1:09 am
KWymore (3/2/2014)
Carlo Romagnano (3/2/2014)
Igor Micev (3/2/2014)
Question is identical with that of 2014/02/26.The answer is also identical.
Am I missing something?
+1
But where is EXCEPT-1?
Why, if the qotd is identical to that of 2014/02/26, somebody got it wrong?
+1 Was expecting something different based on the category. Thanks for the easy points!
me : 0; Deja vu: 1
ww; Raghu
--
The first and the hardest SQL statement I have wrote- "select * from customers" - and I was happy and felt smart.
March 3, 2014 at 1:28 am
Raghavendra Mudugal (3/3/2014)
KWymore (3/2/2014)
Carlo Romagnano (3/2/2014)
Igor Micev (3/2/2014)
Question is identical with that of 2014/02/26.The answer is also identical.
Am I missing something?
+1
But where is EXCEPT-1?
Why, if the qotd is identical to that of 2014/02/26, somebody got it wrong?
+1 Was expecting something different based on the category. Thanks for the easy points!
me : 0; Deja vu: 1
At least I am not the only one almost getting confused...
March 3, 2014 at 3:13 am
I guess there is something wrong with this question as it should be like follows:
SELECT X AS 'Except'
FROM A
EXCEPT
SELECT Y
FROM B
but maybe the author took it copy/paste from his 1st question and forgot to change the code.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Hany Helmy
SQL Server Database Consultant
March 3, 2014 at 3:22 am
Hany Helmy (3/3/2014)
I guess there is something wrong with this question as it should be like follows:
SELECT X AS 'Except'
FROM A
EXCEPT
SELECT Y
FROM B
but maybe the author took it copy/paste from his 1st question and forgot to change the code.
I don't think so, the answers are incompatibile, too.
March 3, 2014 at 4:15 am
KWymore (3/2/2014)
Carlo Romagnano (3/2/2014)
Igor Micev (3/2/2014)
Question is identical with that of 2014/02/26.The answer is also identical.
Am I missing something?
+1
But where is EXCEPT-1?
Why, if the qotd is identical to that of 2014/02/26, somebody got it wrong?
+1 Was expecting something different based on the category. Thanks for the easy points!
March 3, 2014 at 5:04 am
Same question as 26/02/2014, same answer -> easy one, thanks :hehe:
March 3, 2014 at 5:27 am
It was a nice, easy one to start the week, so thanks.
March 3, 2014 at 8:45 am
I keep waiting for the SQL Server database engine to add the ability to use "CORRESPONDING BY" with set difference queries such as these. Good thing I haven't held my breath....
March 3, 2014 at 9:35 am
sneumersky (3/3/2014)
I keep waiting for the SQL Server database engine to add the ability to use "CORRESPONDING BY" with set difference queries such as these. Good thing I haven't held my breath....
Yeah, I wish the SQL language standard incorporated
INSERT CORRESPONDING INTO a
SELECT * FROM b
Well, there is a way around it...
March 3, 2014 at 9:36 am
Ron, I always enjoy your QotDs - thanks!
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 28 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply