Restore DB

  • Active / Active Clusters

    SQL 2008

    Windows 2008 R2

    I get the following error message when using the GUI to try and restore (this happens for each of the nodes in the Active/ Active Cluster)

    I have verified that the Service Account running SQL Server has permissions to the LUN. I have also verified that my account has permissions to the LUN. I can execute the following from within SSMS:

    EXEC master.dbo.xp_cmdshell 'dir e:\ /s'

    The execution of that query does provide a full directory output.

    I can see the LUN from explorer and have been able to place a test file there to confirm access.

    I have not confirmed but I suspect that I can restore the databases via script since I can run the dir from SSMS.

    Any thoughts on what may be causing this in the GUI?

    Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
    _______________________________________________
    I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
    SQL RNNR
    Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
    Learn Extended Events

  • Is the E drive a cluster resource? Is it set as a dependency of the SQL Server resource?

    Gail Shaw
    Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
    SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

    We walk in the dark places no others will enter
    We stand on the bridge and no one may pass
  • I knew I forgot to add some information

    Yes that LUN is a Cluster resource and is a dependency for SQL Server. SQL Server will not start if I leave that resource offline.

    I can also offline the SQL group and it will take the LUNs offline. If I move the SQL Cluster, all LUNS will move with it.

    Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
    _______________________________________________
    I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
    SQL RNNR
    Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
    Learn Extended Events

  • GilaMonster (7/8/2010)


    Is the E drive a cluster resource? Is it set as a dependency of the SQL Server resource?

    K - lesson learned. The drive was not listed as a dependency for SQL Server. Triple check dependencies in the future and don't just rely on stop/start, move, offline of the SQL Cluster.

    Thanks Gail.

    Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
    _______________________________________________
    I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
    SQL RNNR
    Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
    Learn Extended Events

  • *edit* Never mind.

    Gail Shaw
    Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
    SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

    We walk in the dark places no others will enter
    We stand on the bridge and no one may pass
  • This is for our QA environment and I found out that somebody from the server team had removed the LUN dependencies while I was on vacation this last week. What a pain.

    Thanks again Gail.

    Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
    _______________________________________________
    I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
    SQL RNNR
    Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
    Learn Extended Events

  • CirquedeSQLeil (7/8/2010)


    This is for our QA environment and I found out that somebody from the server team had removed the LUN dependencies while I was on vacation this last week. What a pain.

    Slap the culprit with a SQL manual when you find him please. Removing the dependency would have required taking SQL offline and back online. It's not something you can do by accident.

    Gail Shaw
    Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
    SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

    We walk in the dark places no others will enter
    We stand on the bridge and no one may pass
  • GilaMonster (7/8/2010)


    CirquedeSQLeil (7/8/2010)


    This is for our QA environment and I found out that somebody from the server team had removed the LUN dependencies while I was on vacation this last week. What a pain.

    Slap the culprit with a SQL manual when you find him please. Removing the dependency would have required taking SQL offline and back online. It's not something you can do by accident.

    Just another one of those slaps. It has been happening a bit more lately. I know who it is too.

    Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
    _______________________________________________
    I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
    SQL RNNR
    Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
    Learn Extended Events

  • on a Windows 2008 cluster, you do not have to take the SQL Server service resource offline when removing a disk dependency!

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply