December 20, 2010 at 10:38 am
I have many tables all with different fields and I need to export the contents of each of them as 1 single XML resultset with a root node
I am trying to do this through a stored procedure.
For example.
SELECT fieldA, fieldB
FROM table1 FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS, ROOT ('Root')
SELECT fieldC, fieldD
FROM table2 FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
I need to get the result as
<root>
<rec>
<field1>value</field1>
<field2>value</field2>
</rec>
<rec>
<field1>value from fieldC</field1>
<field2>value from fieldD</field2>
</rec>
</root>
December 20, 2010 at 12:13 pm
Unfortunately, we don't have any table def or sample data to play with.
But based on the identical structure within each rec node I'd recommend to use a UNION statement to merge the two result sets and apply the XML formatting afterwards.
For a coded version please provide ready to use sample data as described in the first link in my signature.
December 22, 2010 at 4:32 am
I have a table named CUS
This has fields ID, Name, Postcode
I also have a table named PRD
This has fields Item, Value
My end result is this
<Root>
<rec>
<ID>ABC123value</ID>
<Name>Acme Corp</Name>
<Postcode>M1 4XY</Postcode>
</rec>
<rec>
<Item>SQL 2008 R2</Item>
<Value>5000</Value>
</rec>
<rec>
<Item>SQL 2005</Item>
<Value>4500</Value>
</rec>
</Root>
I can get close to this with the queries
SELECT ID, Name, Postcode
FROM CUS FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS, ROOT ('Root')
SELECT Item, Value
FROM PRD FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
But I need a single result set not 2.
Any ideas how to produce this format?
There are more fields but if I can get this working then I can extend it for all my fields.
Thanks
December 22, 2010 at 6:33 am
sotn (12/22/2010)
Any ideas how to produce this format?
Yes (concept as mentioned before).
For a coded version please provide ready to use sample data as described in the first link in my signature.
December 22, 2010 at 6:39 am
Hi Lutz,
thanks for the reply.
I am a little confused as my previous post shows that my tables have completely different field names and number of fields so I cannot 'easily' use union and it has data in it as well.
my CUS table has 3 fields and 1 record
My PRS table has 2 fields and 2 records
December 22, 2010 at 7:14 am
sotn (12/22/2010)
Hi Lutz,thanks for the reply.
I am a little confused as my previous post shows that my tables have completely different field names and number of fields so I cannot 'easily' use union and it has data in it as well.
my CUS table has 3 fields and 1 record
My PRS table has 2 fields and 2 records
I tend to overlook stuff like that if there's nothing to copy and paste into SSMS where I can benefit from automagic code formatting as well as syntax highlight. I also would have spotted it immediately when I would have tried to help you with a coded version. But, unfortunately... (I guess you know how this would continue...).
I'll step back for now until I can be more helpful.
Currently filed under "help us help you pending" 😉
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply