December 13, 2010 at 11:43 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item mixed_extent_page_count
Thanks.
December 14, 2010 at 12:59 am
The bad news is that, according to BOL, "this view is applicable only to the tempdb database".
December 14, 2010 at 1:02 am
Very nice question, definately learned something.
And thanks to vk-kirov for pointing out an important remark. I hadn't even noticed it when I read the BOL page.
Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
December 14, 2010 at 2:32 am
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
December 14, 2010 at 3:51 am
vk-kirov (12/14/2010)
The bad news is that, according to BOL, "this view is applicable only to the tempdb database".
I would not expect much change in SGAM pages in a normal database. Table creation rates should be low compared to tempdb, so frequent changes in SGAM page allocation is unusual.
December 14, 2010 at 7:34 am
Nils Gustav Stråbø (12/14/2010)
vk-kirov (12/14/2010)
The bad news is that, according to BOL, "this view is applicable only to the tempdb database".I would not expect much change in SGAM pages in a normal database. Table creation rates should be low compared to tempdb, so frequent changes in SGAM page allocation is unusual.
I believe this is more important to monitor when you are using Mirroing or Publishing a VLDB.
Also it may be usefull you execute large querries (5K+ rows) that use TEMP tables or Table Parameters that have to create objects to store data in TEMPdB.
December 14, 2010 at 10:24 am
Thanks for the question.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
December 14, 2010 at 11:17 pm
Thnx to all for your valuable feedback !! .. 🙂
Thanks.
December 15, 2010 at 9:58 am
Thanks, good question. I knew I should have picked dm_db_file_space_usage!
- webrunner
-------------------
A SQL query walks into a bar and sees two tables. He walks up to them and asks, "Can I join you?"
Ref.: http://tkyte.blogspot.com/2009/02/sql-joke.html
December 15, 2010 at 3:28 pm
Thanks for the question, I learned a couple things. 🙂
December 16, 2010 at 6:45 pm
Thanks for teh question. It made me look in BoL, which some say is cheating (and I say is learning).
Tom
December 16, 2010 at 11:50 pm
I had to do the same (look i BOL), but I don't consider that cheating. "Cheating" in my opinion is when you copy/paste/run the T-SQL and post the answer without utilizing a single neuron in the central nervous system.
December 18, 2010 at 6:30 am
SanDroid (12/14/2010)
Nils Gustav Stråbø (12/14/2010)
vk-kirov (12/14/2010)
The bad news is that, according to BOL, "this view is applicable only to the tempdb database".I would not expect much change in SGAM pages in a normal database. Table creation rates should be low compared to tempdb, so frequent changes in SGAM page allocation is unusual.
I believe this is more important to monitor when you are using Mirroing or Publishing a VLDB.
Also it may be usefull you execute large querries (5K+ rows) that use TEMP tables or Table Parameters that have to create objects to store data in TEMPdB.
No, Nils is quite correct.
I have no idea why you think mirroring, or publishing a large database would be a prime factor in tempdb SGAM contention.
Where does your magic figure of 5K+ rows come from, or are you just guessing?
Paul White
SQLPerformance.com
SQLkiwi blog
@SQL_Kiwi
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply