How to create procedure from definition of another procedure

  • Hello everyone!!!

    I need help to create procedure from definition of another procedure(may be from sp_helptext)

    please help

  • I am not sure why you need to re-create sp with other name that may not be best practice

    but here is the way how you can do that

    declare @sql varchar(4000)

    select @SQL=routine_definition from information_schema.routines where routine_name='usp_ExistingSPName'

    set @sql=replace(@sql,'usp_ExistingSPName','usp_NewSpName')

    print @sql

    exec(@sql)

  • Thanks...

    I do this in production for save back up's before altering procedure

  • roman.goldenberg (11/29/2010)


    Thanks...

    I do this in production for save back up's before altering procedure

    As a side bar, backups of this nature are fine but you may want to look into some form of source control.

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

    Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.


    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

  • Information_Schema.Routines will only return the first 4000 characters of your stored procedure. If there is any chance at all that your stored proc is longer than that, you'll probably want to use sp_helptext instead.

    Drew

    J. Drew Allen
    Business Intelligence Analyst
    Philadelphia, PA

  • I'd suggest using OBJECT_DEFINITION rather than the other methods mentioned.

    Scott Pletcher, SQL Server MVP 2008-2010

  • I agree with Scott... the OBJECT_DEFINITION function is documented and easy to use for just about everything except a table. Take a look in Books Online for the details.

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

    Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.


    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

  • and what about length?

  • roman.goldenberg (11/30/2010)


    and what about length?

    The only time length is a problem is if you try to view the output of the function in SSMS... which limits things to 8K.

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

    Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.


    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

  • Since OBJECT_DEFINITION returns an NVARCHAR(MAX), I would expect it to be able to return up to 2G - 1 (or roughly 1 billion visible characters).

    I've never had any issue with the return value from it not containing the full text of a procedure ... although actually viewing the entire text at once can be tricky, because of the limitations in Mgmt Studio and some other viewing software.

    You may want to write a quick loop to chop it into pieces to PRINT / SELECT the results to view in MS.

    SELECT displays more characters than PRINT, but both have limitations.

    Scott Pletcher, SQL Server MVP 2008-2010

  • scott.pletcher (11/30/2010)


    Since OBJECT_DEFINITION returns an NVARCHAR(MAX), I would expect it to be able to return up to 2G - 1 (or roughly 1 billion visible characters).

    I've never had any issue with the return value from it not containing the full text of a procedure ... although actually viewing the entire text at once can be tricky, because of the limitations in Mgmt Studio and some other viewing software.

    You may want to write a quick loop to chop it into pieces to PRINT / SELECT the results to view in MS.

    SELECT displays more characters than PRINT, but both have limitations.

    If you want to view it, I'd suggest running sp_helptext instead. (Oh, wait. I already did suggest that.)

    Drew

    J. Drew Allen
    Business Intelligence Analyst
    Philadelphia, PA

  • Actually, I think the original q dealt with duplicating the stored proc code. For that, I still think OBJECT_DEFINITION works much better than sp_helptext.

    Scott Pletcher, SQL Server MVP 2008-2010

  • Thanks all for the help

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply