June 17, 2012 at 4:42 am
Comments posted to this topic are about the item The Redmond Agenda
June 18, 2012 at 12:11 am
It talks about five things Redmond doesn't want you to know, and the first item is that the cloud is first. New releases of products will likely come in the cloud first, and in a version you can buy second. The article mentions Sharepoint, but many other Microsoft products live in the cloud, including SQL Server.
Is that a bad thing?
Depends on what new features / functionality that is included I would say. If it's something you really want then it can be annoying.
I however fear that support for non cloud based solutions will become worse because of the cloud focus. Hopefully this fear is not warranted.
June 20, 2012 at 9:22 am
This could actually make RTM releases more solid. With the cloud users working out a number of the bugs we may see less patching necessary on boxes we host.
June 21, 2012 at 3:34 pm
cfradenburg (6/20/2012)
This could actually make RTM releases more solid. With the cloud users working out a number of the bugs we may see less patching necessary on boxes we host.
That would be a great thing if it happened that way.
There are some things that work well in the cloud and I still hold my reservations about moving to the cloud.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
June 22, 2012 at 8:58 am
I still have seen nothing to convince me that regulatory requirements like HIPAA, SOX, FDA validation, et al can be safely supported in an external cloud. Internal, maybe, but how can a DBA guarantee data protection at that level when someone else owns and maintains the servers?
June 22, 2012 at 9:14 am
jeff.mason (6/22/2012)
I still have seen nothing to convince me that regulatory requirements like HIPAA, SOX, FDA validation, et al can be safely supported in an external cloud. Internal, maybe, but how can a DBA guarantee data protection at that level when someone else owns and maintains the servers?
The third party vendor has to support those same regulatory requirements. If they aren't cretified under the necessary authorities, you don't use them.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply