December 23, 2005 at 5:26 pm
December 26, 2005 at 8:00 am
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
December 27, 2005 at 2:24 pm
Are you using Imceda's Litespeed. That is what we are doing. We backup the 2000 DB with LS which results in dramatically smaller backup file size and then restore with LS on SQL2005.
I could never get the database copy to work between different vers...
December 27, 2005 at 2:36 pm
We are using Idera SQL Safe. I am checking with vendor to see whether their version will work with SQL Server 2005.
Thanks,
Igor
March 27, 2006 at 11:35 am
Igor,
Idera has released a new version that works on both SQL Server 2000 and 2005 (and they added native 64bit). We're running SQL Safe in both 2000 and 2005 (32bit and 64bit) platforms and it's working great.
March 31, 2006 at 9:26 am
There are other backup products as well. Check out this comparison review which evaluates several leading products.
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/wbrown/fourofakindbackupsoftwareshootout.asp
You can also detach the database, get it to the new server, and re-attach it. SQL Server 2005 will automatically upgrade it. If you have a very fast network or fast, big, removable media, that might be feasible. Otherwise the compression these programs provide will be your friend.
March 31, 2006 at 11:22 am
We have attached database on SQL 2005 server and pretty happy about the process.
Igor
April 12, 2006 at 7:42 am
If you do the "detach-reattach" method, make sure to rebuild the statistics as otherwise the database will still use the 2000 version of the execution plans and etc... Ran across this problem one day on a database of only 20 GB of data. Re-building the statistics made a rather visible difference in day to day operation.
April 25, 2006 at 7:48 am
Christopher, can we simply deattach and attach from SQL 2000 to SQL 2005? can we do vice versa? I took all user databases backup in SQL 2000. uninstall SQL 2000. Install SQL 2005 . Restore sql 2000 backup. Am i on the right track??
:crazy: :alien:
Umar Iqbal
April 25, 2006 at 3:43 pm
That should work just fine. Doing the reverse tends to not work at all even though the file headers are supposed to be compatible but from 2000 to 2005 it seems to work just fine.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply