November 1, 2004 at 3:31 am
hiya,
I found myself installing sqlServer dev edition onto a machine that contained MSDE, simply so that I could use enterprise manager to :
1) attach a database
2) create a new user.
That can't be right 🙁
Is osql the recommended way to interact with MSDE, so that I can miss out the enterprise manager middleman?
many thanks,
yogi
November 1, 2004 at 11:10 am
If you do not want to use the Enterprise Manager, you can try with Access. But I had a client that used MSDE for field operations and I really prefered using Enterprise Manager to manipulate their database - I could even connect over the network if they were somewhere else but able to log into Citrix...
I wasn't born stupid - I had to study.
November 1, 2004 at 3:47 pm
yogiberr,
for remote admin and development i have started to give some of our developers 'Microsoft SQL Web Data Administrator'
it has a jazzy security admin tool, allowing you to create and edit logins and users.
for attaching databases i think you will still have to use system sprocs, but you can manage a heck of a lot with 'Microsoft SQL Web Data Administrator' if you have a dig around.
regards,
lloyd
p.s. it requires the .NET framework to be installed
November 1, 2004 at 4:25 pm
hiya,
I'll look into 'Microsoft SQL Web Data Administrator' sounds quite good.(we're dotnet people 🙂
I am curious though, as to the main reason for using osql.Is it so that "seasoned" users can manipulate the db quicker thru a commandline, rather than having to open up EM and point and click?
ta for the advice so far,
yogi
November 2, 2004 at 6:23 am
hi there,
visit the following website and you will find vb source code for your own version of enterprise manager.
http://www.planetsourcecode.com/
regards
zaid
November 2, 2004 at 8:10 am
You can just install Enterprise Manager without the dev version of SQLServer database. I believe that you can install Enterprise Manager on as many machines as you want.
I have read that with the SQLServer 2005 MSDE (Express) you can no longer use Enterprise Manager. MS makes you use a much less "feature rich" tool.
November 3, 2004 at 7:51 am
Hi Grasshopper,
It wasn't the fact that I couldn't install EM on as many machines as I wanted.It was the fact that I didn't think that I should have to install EM on the machine, simply because I wanted to do a few simple things to the database.
Thanks for taking the time to reply everyone.
I appreciate it.
yogi
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply