February 22, 2017 at 10:10 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Adding More Power
February 22, 2017 at 10:11 pm
Good question, thanks Steve.
Have had to use this recently on a poorly performing Azure db
____________________________________________
Space, the final frontier? not any more...
All limits henceforth are self-imposed.
βlibera tute vulgaris exβ
February 23, 2017 at 6:41 am
Thanks for this question. I learned something new. I appreciate the Microsoft Azure documentation. π
February 23, 2017 at 11:57 am
Thanks, Steve. It is interesting that the correct and wrong answers are at this time almost evenly spread.
February 23, 2017 at 3:36 pm
I haven't used Azure and don't have much chance of using Azure any time soon.
February 27, 2017 at 8:23 am
Revenant - Thursday, February 23, 2017 11:57 AMThanks, Steve. It is interesting that the correct and wrong answers are at this time almost evenly spread.
And that's still true four days later.
Probably a lot of people don't realise that there are 4 different syntaxes for ALTER Database SET OPTIONS according to which kind of Service it is run on (ordinary SQL Server, Azure SQL Database, Azure SQL Data Warehouse, or Parallel Data Warehouse) so they just look it up in one place - mostly in the wrong place for this question - and get it wrong. Some people know there are four versions and look it up in the right place, so they get it right. Some already know the answer (because they have worked using Azure SQL Data Warehouse) and get it right. Others believe they already know the answer and get it wrong, Some know theydon't know and dont bother to look it up, they just guess.
So there are quite a lot of ways of getting it wrong, but it's actually very easy to get it right by being careful about how one looks it up, which anyone who works (or has ever worked) seriously with SQL Server must have learnt to do. Somehow that has led to a 50% right and 50% wrong stable position.
Tom
March 30, 2017 at 3:10 pm
I liked this question about Azure SQL DW. Bring on more please.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
March 31, 2017 at 1:59 am
SQLRNNR - Thursday, March 30, 2017 3:10 PMI liked this question about Azure SQL DW. Bring on more please.
Feel free to write a few on other topics for me π
April 4, 2017 at 12:00 pm
Steve Jones - SSC Editor - Friday, March 31, 2017 1:59 AMSQLRNNR - Thursday, March 30, 2017 3:10 PMI liked this question about Azure SQL DW. Bring on more please.Feel free to write a few on other topics for me π
Point taken.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
April 4, 2017 at 11:00 pm
Wouldn't it be cheaper in the long run to optimize the code instead of throwing more resources into the picture?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 9, 2017 at 12:06 pm
Jeff Moden - Tuesday, April 4, 2017 11:00 PMWouldn't it be cheaper in the long run to optimize the code instead of throwing more resources into the picture?
Yes, it probably would, but managers tend to be short-term-ists, they don't give a toss about the long term because they'll have moved on and it'll be someone else's problem by the time the long term effects manifest themselves. This tends to apply all th way up to thetop, except in the extremely rare cases where the top management has a real commitment to the company (like if it goes bust so do they).
Tom
April 10, 2017 at 8:17 am
TomThomson - Sunday, April 9, 2017 12:06 PMJeff Moden - Tuesday, April 4, 2017 11:00 PMWouldn't it be cheaper in the long run to optimize the code instead of throwing more resources into the picture?Yes, it probably would, but managers tend to be short-term-ists, they don't give a toss about the long term because they'll have moved on and it'll be someone else's problem by the time the long term effects manifest themselves. This tends to apply all th way up to thetop, except in the extremely rare cases where the top management has a real commitment to the company (like if it goes bust so do they).
Ah! As they say, "TRUE DAT!". π That's the reason why the outgoing manager frequently thinks "Veni, vidi, vici" and the incoming manager thinks "Veni, vidi, WTF!?" I wonder how many of them know the parable of the 3 envelopes? π Many do seem to practice it.
http://www.design.caltech.edu/erik/Misc/Prepare_3_Envelopes.html
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply